Comparison of airborne measurements of NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, HONO, NO<sub><i>y</i></sub>, and CO during FIREX-AQ

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract. We present a comparison of fast-response instruments installed onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft that measured nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), nitrous acid (HONO), total reactive odd (measured both as (NOy) from sum individually species (ΣNOy)), carbon monoxide (CO) in troposphere during 2019 Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) campaign. By targeting smoke summertime wildfires, prescribed fires, agricultural burns across continental United States, FIREX-AQ provided unique opportunity investigate measurement accuracy concentrated plumes where hundreds coexist. Here, we compare NO measurements by chemiluminescence (CL) laser-induced fluorescence (LIF); NO2 CL, LIF, cavity-enhanced spectroscopy (CES); HONO CES iodide-adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS); CO tunable diode laser absorption (TDLAS) integrated cavity output (ICOS). Additionally, NOy using CL instrument were compared with ΣNOy (= + nitric (HNO3) acyl peroxy nitrates (APNs) submicrometer particulate nitrate (pNO3)). Other not included they either contributed minimally it (e.g., C1–C5 alkyl nitrates, nitryl chloride (ClNO2), dinitrogen pentoxide (N2O5)) or higher oxidized (NO3), non-acyl peroxynitrates, coarse-mode aerosol nitrate). The intercomparisons demonstrate following points: (1) LIF agreed well within uncertainties but potentially reduced time response for instrument; (2) uncertainties, was average 10 % higher; (3) CIMS highly correlated each fire plume transect, correlation slope vs. all 1 Hz data 1.8, which attribute reduction sensitivity high-temperature environments; (4) budget closure demonstrated flights combined 25 %. However, used fluid dynamic flow model estimate pNO3 sampling fraction through inlet variable one flight another ranged between 0.36 0.99, meaning approximately 0 %–24 may have been unaccounted be due unmeasured such organic nitrates; (5) ICOS TDLAS systematic offset averaged 2.87 ppbv; (6) integrating followed fitting values improved independent measurements.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

a comparison of linguistic and pragmatic knowledge: a case of iranian learners of english

در این تحقیق دانش زبانشناسی و کاربردشناسی زبان آموزان ایرانی در سطح بالای متوسط مقایسه شد. 50 دانش آموز با سابقه آموزشی مشابه از شش آموزشگاه زبان مختلف در دو آزمون دانش زبانشناسی و آزمون دانش گفتار شناسی زبان انگلیسی شرکت کردند که سوالات هر دو تست توسط محقق تهیه شده بود. همچنین در این تحقیق کارایی کتابهای آموزشی زبان در فراهم آوردن درون داد کافی برای زبان آموزان ایرانی به عنوان هدف جانبی تحقیق ...

15 صفحه اول

assessment of deep word knowledge in elementary and advanced iranian efl learners: a comparison of selective and productive wat tasks

testing plays a vital role in any language teaching program. it allows teachers and stakeholders, including program administrators, parents, admissions officers and prospective employers to be assured that the learners are progressing according to an accepted standard (douglas, 2010). the problems currently facing language testers have both practical and theoretical implications but the first i...

on the comparison of keyword and semantic-context methods of learning new vocabulary meaning

the rationale behind the present study is that particular learning strategies produce more effective results when applied together. the present study tried to investigate the efficiency of the semantic-context strategy alone with a technique called, keyword method. to clarify the point, the current study seeked to find answer to the following question: are the keyword and semantic-context metho...

15 صفحه اول

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1867-1381', '1867-8548']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4901-2022